Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD FirePro S10000

AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD FirePro S10000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 +180%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Nov 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

15.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
38.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1216 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
76.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
Zaphod
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy