CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 250X vs ATI FirePro V7900
AMD Radeon R7 250X vs ATI FirePro V7900
VS
AMD Radeon R7 250X
ATI FirePro V7900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
+52%
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X
VS
FirePro V7900
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
May 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
38.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1216 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
76.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
Cayman
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 250X vs ATI Radeon HD 5970
2
AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
3
AMD Radeon R7 250X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI
4
AMD Radeon R7 250X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
5
AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD Radeon Sky 500
6
AMD Radeon R7 250X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
7
AMD Radeon R7 250X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
8
AMD Radeon R7 250X vs ATI FireMV 2250
9
AMD Radeon R7 250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
10
AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT
Related News
1
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
2
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
3
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
4
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
5
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
6
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
7
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
8
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
9
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
10
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy