Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250X vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD Radeon R7 250X vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +52%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
May 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

15.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
38.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1216 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
76.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Cayman
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy