Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD FireStream 9350

AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350 +65%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
18
640
Shading Units
1440
40
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

15.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
38.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1216 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
76.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Cypress
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy