Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

AMD Radeon R7 250X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 120W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 +313%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Mar 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.1GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
640
Shading Units
1408
40
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

15.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
38.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
1216 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
76.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
120W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
TU116
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy