Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250X vs NVIDIA RTX A400

AMD Radeon R7 250X vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +122%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Apr 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
640
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

15.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
38.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
1216 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
76.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GA107
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy