CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 250XE vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
AMD Radeon R7 250XE vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
VS
AMD Radeon R7 250XE
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250XE and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250XE 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250XE
1.101 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
+8%
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250XE
VS
Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
10
640
Shading Units
800
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
13.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
34.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1101 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
68.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV770
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
RV770 XT Mac (215-0669080)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Board Design
80W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE
2
AMD Radeon R7 250XE vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI
3
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE
4
AMD Radeon R7 250XE vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
5
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE
6
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE
8
AMD Radeon R7 250XE vs ATI Radeon HD 5830
9
AMD Radeon R7 250XE vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
10
AMD Radeon R7 250XE vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Related News
1
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
2
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
3
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
4
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
5
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
6
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
7
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
8
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
9
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
10
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy