Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260
1.536 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +419%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Mar 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
48.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.536 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Bonaire PRO
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy