CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
VS
AMD Radeon R7 260
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260
1.536 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+419%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260
VS
FirePro S9300 X2
Graphics Card
Dec 2013
Release Date
Mar 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
48.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.536 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Bonaire PRO
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs ATI FirePro V9800P
2
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon R9 370 1024SP
3
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
4
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
5
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400
6
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
7
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs ATI Radeon X1050 AGP
8
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
9
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
10
AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy