Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260 vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon R7 260 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260 +146%
1.536 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Feb 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
480
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
48.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.536 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Turks
Bonaire PRO
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy