Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD FirePro W4000

AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 115W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X +55%
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
12
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

115W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy