Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD FirePro W8000

AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (115W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +63%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Tahiti
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy