CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
VS
AMD Radeon R7 265
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
904 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
+1215%
1.894 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
VS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
3
1024
Shading Units
120
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV630
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
2
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 265
3
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670 640SP Edition
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
5
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
6
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs AMD Radeon R7 265
8
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
9
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
10
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy