Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (58W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +1852%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 220 OEM
0.097 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Oct 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.048 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.096 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
97.15 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
58W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT215
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy