CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
VS
AMD Radeon R7 265
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
+81%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
1.046 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
VS
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Sep 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
7
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
336
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.91 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.62 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1046 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.19 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
GF114
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
2
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 265
3
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670 640SP Edition
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
5
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
6
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs AMD Radeon R7 265
8
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
9
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104
10
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy