Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +40%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480
1.345 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Mar 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
15
1024
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
60
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.03 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1345 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
168.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GF100
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GF100-375-A3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy