Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (150W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1058MHz vs 925MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 +71%
3.25 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Mar 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1006 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
195W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GK104
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy