AMD Radeon R7 265 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+1197%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
512
32
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
450W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
22 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
