Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V7300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1243MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V7300X +202%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1188 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy