Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +4756%
1.894 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Jan 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT218
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
18W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy