CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
VS
AMD Radeon R7 265
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
+51%
2.867 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
VS
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
28
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 265
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
3
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670 640SP Edition
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
5
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
6
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
7
ATI Radeon HD 5850 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
8
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106
9
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
10
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy