Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Feb 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV530
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy