CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs AMD FirePro S9000
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs AMD FirePro S9000
VS
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM
AMD FirePro S9000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265X OEM
2.368 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000
+36%
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265X OEM
VS
FirePro S9000
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
28
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Curacao
GPU Name
Tahiti
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
2
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
3
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 360
4
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
5
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4750
6
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
7
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP
8
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs ATI FireGL V5600
9
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
10
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
Related News
1
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
2
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
3
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
4
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
5
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
6
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
7
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
8
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
9
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
10
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy