Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs Intel Arc A310

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 124% (1750MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
Arc A310 +348%
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2022
Pirate Islands
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy