Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD FirePro W9100

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +774%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
176
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy