Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 238% (2640MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +2157%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
2505 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy