Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM +211%
0.599 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
120
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 XT (215CDABKA15FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy