Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 112% (1650MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300 +605%
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2020
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy