Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 231% (2580MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600 +1443%
9.247 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
2331 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
289.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.49 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.247 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
577.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 23
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy