Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 98% (1546MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano +2013%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1247 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy