Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 640SP and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 640SP
1.184 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +574%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2019
Release Date
Mar 2016
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
37.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1184 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
74.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy