Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (1880MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700 +974%
8.663 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2019
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
205W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 10
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy