Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 65W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
41W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
Floppy

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV530
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy