CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
VS
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 85W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 896SP
+184%
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
0.693 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 896SP
VS
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
May 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.216 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
692.7 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.86 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
GK208
Tobago XT
GPU Variant
GK208-301-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Board Design
85W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
2
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
3
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
4
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
5
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA RTX A400
6
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
8
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
9
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
10
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy