Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 896SP +267%
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
896
Shading Units
216
56
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
GT200B
Tobago XT
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy