Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 896SP
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +445%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jun 2017
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
230W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Vega 10
Tobago XT
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy