Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 896SP
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +58%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Navi 24
Tobago XT
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy