Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360 vs ATI FireGL V8650

AMD Radeon R7 360 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 +266%
1.613 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Aug 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
R600
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy