Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon R7 360 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
RV380
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy