AMD Radeon R7 360E vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360E
+1020%
1.613 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
73W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
RV630
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
