AMD Radeon R7 360E vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360E
+224%
1.613 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Nov 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
RV670
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
