AMD Radeon R7 360E vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360E
+34%
1.613 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
RV770
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
