AMD Radeon R7 360E vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI308X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI308X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI308X 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
18688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360E
1.613 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI308X
+4966%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Dec 2023
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
19456
48
TMUs
1216
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
750W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
153 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
N/A
