Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 435 OEM and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 435 OEM
0.589 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +478%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2016
Release Date
Nov 2012
Arctic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
20
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.360 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
18.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
588.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
36.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy