Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 435 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 435 OEM +9%
0.589 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2016
Release Date
Nov 2008
Arctic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
320
Shading Units
216
20
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.360 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
18.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
588.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
36.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy