Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5300M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1250MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5300M +325%
3.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
All-In-One
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
23.52 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
85W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Navi 14
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XLM
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy