AMD Radeon R7 A360 vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A360 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1266MHz vs 1125MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A360
0.864 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
+575%
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Sep 2016
All-In-One
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1100 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
27.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
864.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
864.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
54.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Meso
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Meso XT
(216-0864018)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
