Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5300M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1250MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M260
0.752 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5300M +325%
3.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
Gem System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

940 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
23.52 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
752.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
47.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
85W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Navi 14
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XLM
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy