Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 M365X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon R7 M365X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 M365X and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1335MHz vs 960MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M365X
0.633 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +547%
4.101 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2019
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
960 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Litho
GPU Name
TU116
Litho XT (216-0868010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy