Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 M365X vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

AMD Radeon R7 M365X vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 M365X and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 M365X 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 M260 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (980MHz vs 960MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M365X
0.633 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M260 +18%
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2014
Gem System
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
940 MHz
960 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
752.6 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Litho
GPU Name
Topaz
Litho XT (216-0868010)
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy