Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs AMD FirePro S7000

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs AMD FirePro S7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 260 OEM
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000 +23%
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Aug 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
20
896
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

85W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy