Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9170

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 260 OEM
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +165%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jul 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Hawaii
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy